High Temperature Heat Capacity of Aqueous Species
The thermodynamic data of aqueous species have been extensively investigated in the high temperature geology and related fields. During this course, a new equation of representing the high temperature heat capacity of aqueous sepcies has been proposed and widely used in those fields. Unfortunately, this equation is not well consist with the MALT representaion equation.
(1) Literature
271. Shock, EL., Sassani, DC., Willis, M., Sverjensky, DA., Geochimica
Cosmochimia Acta 61(5),907-950 1997.
272. Accornero, M., Marini, L., Lelli, M., Applied Geochem. 25, 242-260 2010.
273. (a) Marini, L., Accornero, M., Environ. Geol. 52, 1343-1363 2007.
       
(b) Marini, L., Accornero, M., Environ. Earth Sci.59, 1601-1606 2010.
332. Haas, JR., Shock, EL., Sassani, DC., Geochim. Cosmochim.Acta 59(21),
4329-4350 1995.
333. Sverjensky, DA., Shock, EL., Helgeson, HC., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61
(7), 1359-1413 1997.
334. Sassani, D., Shock, EL., Geochim. CosmoChim. Acta 62(15), 2643-2671,
1998.
(2) Method of Conversion
- Proposed heat capacity equation
When pressure is given as the standard pressure,
the high temperature heat capacity of aqueous spceis can be represented
as follows;
Here, c1 and c2 are the constant of the constant term and the special term introduced for the aqueous species in which
Θ, constant, is used to specify the temperature dependence.
- MALT adopted equation
MALT adopts the following equation.
Cp = Ca
+ Cb/10-3 * T/K
+ Cc/105 /(T/K)2
+ Cd/10-6 * (T/K)2
+ Ce/108 /(T/K)3
Here, normal temperature dependences are assumed.
- Conversion scheme
Since it will be troublesome to include the above special temperature dependence term, it is adopted to convert this term into the normal terms by least square method. The adopted results are given as follows;
For c2=1000 and Θ = 228
the following coefficients were obtained:
Ca = 22.232;    
Cb/10-3 = -27.174;    
Cc/105 = -37.699;    
Cd/10-6 = 0;    
Ce/108 = 8.025
Comparison between two values are made in the following graph. Agreement is sutisfactorily good.

Fig. 1 Comparison between two Cp equations.
MALT Main Menus MALT Commands MALT Dialogs